<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Point to Point</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.bradhubbard.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.bradhubbard.net</link>
	<description>Technology and Me</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:23:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So I&#8217;ve been busy by Brad</title>
		<link>http://blog.bradhubbard.net/2012/11/06/so-ive-been-busy/comment-page-1/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 21:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bradhubbard.net/?p=174#comment-608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite aware. In fact, it ties in a bit deeper to the product. The whole push notification things is only 

One of the initial pain points (and the primary reason we went with the one-question format) was to drive at decisions, not passive information gathering.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite aware. In fact, it ties in a bit deeper to the product. The whole push notification things is only </p>
<p>One of the initial pain points (and the primary reason we went with the one-question format) was to drive at decisions, not passive information gathering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on So I&#8217;ve been busy by Zak Berrie</title>
		<link>http://blog.bradhubbard.net/2012/11/06/so-ive-been-busy/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Zak Berrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2012 16:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bradhubbard.net/?p=174#comment-605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m checking in here to make sure you&#039;re aware that a the term &quot;Push Poll&quot; has a very very negative connotation from politics that you may not want to be associated with.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push_poll

Are you aware of this?  Is that something you want to be associated with?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m checking in here to make sure you&#8217;re aware that a the term &#8220;Push Poll&#8221; has a very very negative connotation from politics that you may not want to be associated with.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push_poll" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push_poll</a></p>
<p>Are you aware of this?  Is that something you want to be associated with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Parse and/or Backend-as-a-Service by Husein Choroomi</title>
		<link>http://blog.bradhubbard.net/2012/07/09/parse-andor-backend-as-a-service/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Husein Choroomi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bradhubbard.net/?p=161#comment-308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well said! It&#039;s good for basic prototyping and as you said in a small dev shop to get things started, but that&#039;s about it. Of course, they can work on some server-side logic to add some intelligence to the service but even then the majority of apps will need more than that and will end up developing their own backends.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said! It&#8217;s good for basic prototyping and as you said in a small dev shop to get things started, but that&#8217;s about it. Of course, they can work on some server-side logic to add some intelligence to the service but even then the majority of apps will need more than that and will end up developing their own backends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Should Youtube pay Musicians for Showing their Commercials? by Brad</title>
		<link>http://blog.bradhubbard.net/2009/03/13/why-should-youtube-should-pay-musicians-for-showing-their-commercials/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 17:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bradhubbard.net/2009/03/why-should-youtube-should-pay-musicians-for-showing-their-commercials/#comment-300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I appreciate your point, and I wasn&#039;t actually discussing the use of Youtube as a medium by which people share the works of artists without their permission. Youtube pays musicians for the privilege of showing their music videos, does not charge them to host or distribute those videos, and has considerable infrastructure costs associated with that content. When the labels (such as WMG) backed out of a deal they&#039;d already struck with Google for payment of their Youtube videos, what happened was far worse for artists and their fans than Google. That was the point of the article. And for those artists in particular, their music videos are commercials for their live performances, and Google is taking on all the cost of broadcasting them. In fact I&#039;d argue that for most musicians, recordings of their work are promotional tools, not products unto themselves. That&#039;s why most musicians never make any serious income off of music sales.

However, to your point: No, as an artist, you DON&#039;T get to decide how your work is used once you produce and sell it. At no point in history has that been the case. If I buy a painting, the artist doesn&#039;t get to come to my house and decide where they want it hung, whether I can let me friends see it or what happens when I am tired of it. It is mine, I bought it. In fact, even if I take pictures of it and show my friends, I have not violated the copyright of that artist. Even if I put it up on a public walkway or outside my house - that&#039;s my right, I bought it. Re-defining rights to be those retained after purchase is a relatively new concept and is one that was created explicitly to enrich a few at the cost to society. 

Copyright exists for the promotion of science and the useful arts, for the benefit of society (see: US Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8). It does not exist to guarantee an income to artists, and makes no mention of music at all - it refers explicitly to &quot;writings and discoveries&quot;. Your argument that you should get to control what others do with your works is not supported by history, logic, or any other creative industry. It is a sense of entitlement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your point, and I wasn&#8217;t actually discussing the use of Youtube as a medium by which people share the works of artists without their permission. Youtube pays musicians for the privilege of showing their music videos, does not charge them to host or distribute those videos, and has considerable infrastructure costs associated with that content. When the labels (such as WMG) backed out of a deal they&#8217;d already struck with Google for payment of their Youtube videos, what happened was far worse for artists and their fans than Google. That was the point of the article. And for those artists in particular, their music videos are commercials for their live performances, and Google is taking on all the cost of broadcasting them. In fact I&#8217;d argue that for most musicians, recordings of their work are promotional tools, not products unto themselves. That&#8217;s why most musicians never make any serious income off of music sales.</p>
<p>However, to your point: No, as an artist, you DON&#8217;T get to decide how your work is used once you produce and sell it. At no point in history has that been the case. If I buy a painting, the artist doesn&#8217;t get to come to my house and decide where they want it hung, whether I can let me friends see it or what happens when I am tired of it. It is mine, I bought it. In fact, even if I take pictures of it and show my friends, I have not violated the copyright of that artist. Even if I put it up on a public walkway or outside my house &#8211; that&#8217;s my right, I bought it. Re-defining rights to be those retained after purchase is a relatively new concept and is one that was created explicitly to enrich a few at the cost to society. </p>
<p>Copyright exists for the promotion of science and the useful arts, for the benefit of society (see: US Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8). It does not exist to guarantee an income to artists, and makes no mention of music at all &#8211; it refers explicitly to &#8220;writings and discoveries&#8221;. Your argument that you should get to control what others do with your works is not supported by history, logic, or any other creative industry. It is a sense of entitlement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Should Youtube pay Musicians for Showing their Commercials? by Andrew Kremer</title>
		<link>http://blog.bradhubbard.net/2009/03/13/why-should-youtube-should-pay-musicians-for-showing-their-commercials/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Kremer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 10:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bradhubbard.net/2009/03/why-should-youtube-should-pay-musicians-for-showing-their-commercials/#comment-299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The issue that you fail to address is that for the most part, these videos are being posted WITHOUT the permission of the rights holder. As an artist it is my decision on how my work is used. When I see someone making a lot of money from my work, all I am asking for is a fair cut. If I choose to post something without the expectation of receiving remuneration then that is my choice and my choice alone.
Best regards]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue that you fail to address is that for the most part, these videos are being posted WITHOUT the permission of the rights holder. As an artist it is my decision on how my work is used. When I see someone making a lot of money from my work, all I am asking for is a fair cut. If I choose to post something without the expectation of receiving remuneration then that is my choice and my choice alone.<br />
Best regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your Time is a Scarce Resource and Your Trust is a Currency by Brad</title>
		<link>http://blog.bradhubbard.net/2012/02/10/your-time-is-a-scarce-resource-and-your-trust-is-a-currency/comment-page-1/#comment-269</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bradhubbard.net/?p=144#comment-269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it really matters what you&#039;re using a social network for. If it&#039;s for connecting with readers and the general public, the idea of keeping content secret doesn&#039;t really apply. If you&#039;re using it to stay in touch with friends, the circles thing makes total sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it really matters what you&#8217;re using a social network for. If it&#8217;s for connecting with readers and the general public, the idea of keeping content secret doesn&#8217;t really apply. If you&#8217;re using it to stay in touch with friends, the circles thing makes total sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your Time is a Scarce Resource and Your Trust is a Currency by Ted Cabeen</title>
		<link>http://blog.bradhubbard.net/2012/02/10/your-time-is-a-scarce-resource-and-your-trust-is-a-currency/comment-page-1/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Cabeen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bradhubbard.net/?p=144#comment-268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Self-followup.  I could see a system for adding categorization on top of Public posts, but I don&#039;t think it should be a private thing.  Perhaps we just need to add Tags to Google Plus shares, and allow users to select which tags they want to see when adding a person to a circle.  Of course, it would need good defaults and UI, as it could get cumbersome very fast.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Self-followup.  I could see a system for adding categorization on top of Public posts, but I don&#8217;t think it should be a private thing.  Perhaps we just need to add Tags to Google Plus shares, and allow users to select which tags they want to see when adding a person to a circle.  Of course, it would need good defaults and UI, as it could get cumbersome very fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your Time is a Scarce Resource and Your Trust is a Currency by Ted Cabeen</title>
		<link>http://blog.bradhubbard.net/2012/02/10/your-time-is-a-scarce-resource-and-your-trust-is-a-currency/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Cabeen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bradhubbard.net/?p=144#comment-267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;re conjoining the two different circles uses:
1) Circles organize what I want to read.
2) Circles restrict who can see what I say.

Although you can use circles to restrict what you&#039;re saying to interested parties, I don&#039;t necessarily think that&#039;s the best approach.  I think it&#039;s better to post stuff to the widest audience of people who I&#039;m comfortable seeing it.  Once I do that, I can then depend on my readers to categorize my posts in their own circles, and they&#039;ll use Google&#039;s tools to determine how often they want to see my content.  That approach is simpler, and reaches almost the same effect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re conjoining the two different circles uses:<br />
1) Circles organize what I want to read.<br />
2) Circles restrict who can see what I say.</p>
<p>Although you can use circles to restrict what you&#8217;re saying to interested parties, I don&#8217;t necessarily think that&#8217;s the best approach.  I think it&#8217;s better to post stuff to the widest audience of people who I&#8217;m comfortable seeing it.  Once I do that, I can then depend on my readers to categorize my posts in their own circles, and they&#8217;ll use Google&#8217;s tools to determine how often they want to see my content.  That approach is simpler, and reaches almost the same effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your Time is a Scarce Resource and Your Trust is a Currency by Brad</title>
		<link>http://blog.bradhubbard.net/2012/02/10/your-time-is-a-scarce-resource-and-your-trust-is-a-currency/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bradhubbard.net/?p=144#comment-266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Pinterest has the sharing model right, but it&#039;s kind of tough if I&#039;m not sharing captioned images. I think they beat out Tumblr in that sense. But the Pinterest audience seems to be more the &quot;here&#039;s something someone else did that I wanna categorize and share&quot; rather than &quot;Here&#039;s some of my original work, or an article that bears discussion and engagement&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Pinterest has the sharing model right, but it&#8217;s kind of tough if I&#8217;m not sharing captioned images. I think they beat out Tumblr in that sense. But the Pinterest audience seems to be more the &#8220;here&#8217;s something someone else did that I wanna categorize and share&#8221; rather than &#8220;Here&#8217;s some of my original work, or an article that bears discussion and engagement&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your Time is a Scarce Resource and Your Trust is a Currency by Todd Dewell</title>
		<link>http://blog.bradhubbard.net/2012/02/10/your-time-is-a-scarce-resource-and-your-trust-is-a-currency/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd Dewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.bradhubbard.net/?p=144#comment-265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Brad I think Pinterest has a great sharing model.  You post to a board (one of your interests).  People can choose to follow every board you have or just the ones they are interested in.

I think the Google+ Circles model is slightly flawed:  How do I know that a person I put in a circle actually wants to receive the information I&#039;m publishing to that circle?  With close friends you probably know, but Google seems more like Twitter where the people that follow you are not necessarily social friends.  In that case, when you add people to a circle you are pushing posts to people that may not want to receive it.

Pinterest nailed it in my opinion - the user decides what to receive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brad I think Pinterest has a great sharing model.  You post to a board (one of your interests).  People can choose to follow every board you have or just the ones they are interested in.</p>
<p>I think the Google+ Circles model is slightly flawed:  How do I know that a person I put in a circle actually wants to receive the information I&#8217;m publishing to that circle?  With close friends you probably know, but Google seems more like Twitter where the people that follow you are not necessarily social friends.  In that case, when you add people to a circle you are pushing posts to people that may not want to receive it.</p>
<p>Pinterest nailed it in my opinion &#8211; the user decides what to receive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
